Structuralist Perspective
·
Argues that language is a systematic
framework of codes, signs, symbols and meaning. Thus, for the language to be
acquired, it should be scientifically dissected and objectively studied.
Behaviorist Perspective
·
Argues that our brain is a ‘tabula rasa’ or
completely empty, void of any language learning, which means learners acquire
language unconsciously through operant conditioning and habit formation or from
imitation, to reinforcement and finally acquiring language.
Cognitivist Perspective
·
Argues that acquired language learning is
present in learners’ brains and that innately stationed cognitive processors
play a very significant role in producing words, constructing sentences, and
conveying meanings through this acquired learning which is used generally in
actual communication or performance.
Constructivist Perspective
·
Argues that the moment we are born, mental
structure is hereditarily inherited, which is considered as the basic
foundation of all succeeding learning, and developed over time through
assimilating and accommodating new language information.
Social Interactionist Perspective
·
Argues that language acquisition is a
collaborative process in which learning from social interactions integrates
with the knowledge already stored in language learners mental structure.
Which of these language teaching perspectives and methods do you agree most and why?
I concur
to the proposition of ‘Constructivist Perspective’ because I believe that
mental structure is born with us and subsequently developed through
assimilating and accommodating inputs throughout our daily experiences. Moreover,
it is my belief that mental structure is frailly filled with information fed by
the lullabies of our mothers, the constant greetings from our fathers and the
voices of our surroundings even since we are growing inside our mothers’ womb.
This is proven by our behaviors such as coos, cries and smiles---when we were
babies, that we unconsciously understand and we respond in return.
Therefore, this less developed
knowledge is basically the very foundation of all cognitive processes, which
means that it would be a whole lot difficult to accommodate new inputs and
information without it.